Bee Ridge Neighborhoods Committee
 

Home

Current Issues

Meetings
Past Issues
Contact Us
    Bee Ridge
    Neighborhoods Committee
    PO Box 17786
    Sarasota FL 34276
     
Links
 
   SAVEclarkroad.com 
 
Palmer Place

OVERVIEW --The Kemmons Wilson, Inc. d.b.a. Ridgewood Building & Development Co. is seeking rezoning under the Density Bonus provisions of the Affordable Housing Overlay zoning ordinance for 600 units by promising to deliver 300 Community Housing Trust units along with 300 market-rate units east of the intersection of Palmer Blvd. and Iona Rd.

The property is currently zoned Open Use Rural 1 unit per 10 acres for a maximum of 41 units. Under the Future Land Use designation, the property owner has the option to request rezoning for an Open Use Estate Conservation Subdivision with a maximum of 132 units and not use the Affordable Housing Overlay.

Palmer Place and the CHT in the Press >>

July 08 Information
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (3mb) >>
see 07/08/2008 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

May 08 Information
read BRNC May 08 booklet (6mb) >>
see Binding Concept Plan >>
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (6mb) >>
see 05/28/2008 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

April 08 Information
read BRNC April 08 booklet (4mb) >>
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (2mb) >>
see 04/09/2008 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

January 08 Information
read the Applicant's letter >>
see 01/23/2008 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

December 07 Information
read BRNC December 07 questions >>
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (2mb) >>
see 12/11/2007 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

August 07 Information
read BRNC August 07 Comments and Recommendations booklet (4mb) >>
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (3mb) >>
read Appendix to BCC Public Hearing Packet (18mb) >>
see 08/29/2007 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

Current Status

Consideration of Palmer Place
will be a consent item on a

future Board of County Commissioners agenda

This web page will be updated when additional information is available.

07/08 County Commission Hearing

CONSENT SECTION Board of County Commissioners July 8, 2008 from May 28, 2008 -- The Board of County Commissioners removced the item from the consent section to discuss certain infrastructure improvements relating to the proposed project.

The Board of County Commissioners instructed the applicant and staff to propose additional language to coordinate the improvements to Plamer Boulevard and to clarify certain applicant responsiblities.

Consideration was deffered to a future consent agenda.

read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (3mb) >>
see 07/08/2008 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

05/28 County Commission Hearing

PUBLIC HEARING Board of County Commissioners May 28, 2008 continued from April 9, 2008 -- The Applicant amended his rezone petition to address the concerns raised by the Board of County Commissioners at the April 9 Public Hearing.

The applicant agreed to limit the initial down-payment subidies from Sarasota County to 10 percent of the sales price, provide six-foot shoulders and a northside sidewalk along Palmer Blvd., donate the entire Iona Road right of way within the project, build Iona Road from Palmer Blvd. to Webber Rd, provide some restorative plantings in the greenway, and limit the potentional school site to a public school.
read the Hearld-Tribune account of the hearing >>

read BRNC May 08 booklet (6mb) >>
see Binding Concept Plan >>
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (6mb) >>
see 05/28/2008 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

04/09 County Commission Hearing

PUBLIC HEARING Board of County Commissioners April 09, 2008 continued from January 23, 2008 -- The Applicant withdrew his Development of Critical Concern application and amended his rezone petition to request a zoning classification of RSF-1/PUD. The proposed development has a 35-acre parcel reserved for a school site and 600 residential units. 300 units will be market rate and 300 will be Community Housing Trust units.  The Rezone Petition was heard by the Board of County Commissioner and continued the hearing until May 28, 2008 to allow the Apllicant to address the Board of County Commissioners' greenway, road improvement, school capacity and affordable housing concerns.
read the Hearld-Tribune account of the hearing >>

read BRNC April 08 booklet (4mb) >>
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (2mb) >>
see 04/09/2008 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>

01/23 County Commission Hearing

The Applicant confirmed his intention to scale down the proposed development from 1,488 units to 600 units.  300 will be market rate and 300 will be Community Housing Trust units.  The Applicant has also agreed to respect the 550-foot Greenway along Cow Pen Slough and Phillippi Creek -- Main "A" Canal, as well as limit the structure height to 35 feet or less.

The Applicant's testimony was consistent with his letter to the BCC.
read the Applicant's letter >>
read 01/12/08 Hearld-Tribune Exit Interview of CHT CEO M. Guilfoil >>

As the letter states, these changes do not address all the concerns raised by BRNC. 

12/11 County Commission Hearing

PUBLIC HEARING Board of County Commissioners December 11, 2007 continued from August 29, 2007 -- The Development of Critical Concern application and Rezone Petition was heard by the Board of County Commissioner and continued the hearing until January 23, 2008.
read the Hearld-Tribune account of the hearing >>

The applicant and staff responded to some of the concerns we raised at the August hearing. read response >>

SInce the public hearing section of the public hearing had been closed in August, BRNC submitted a list questions for consideration by the BCC. Among the questions were:

Road Improvements Not Provided -- Certain road improvements, at the intersections of Palmer Blvd. and Cattlemen and Packinghouse roads, were not funded in the Sarasota County 2008-12 Capital Improvement Program. Without the improvements the project does not meet transportation concurrency requirements designed to ensure that the infrastructure is adequate for the impact from the project.

The applicant offered to fund and construct some of the improvements before the completion of the project. It asked the County Commission to use its discretion to find the applicant's offer fully satisfies the concurrency requirements even though a failure of concurrency remains. The applicant says this is justified since the project will provide affordable housing units.

In response to BRNC concerns, the applicant has offered to completely fund the improvements needed to bring a portion of Palmer Blvd. up to county standards. The offer, however, fails to improve the segment west of Webber Rd., including the bridge over the Main "A" Canal. Since Webber Road is a primary access point for the project, that segment carries more project traffic than any other on Palmer Blvd. and needs widening as well.

Rental Apartment -- The applicant and the Community Housing Trust (CHT) has consistently said the Palmer Place affordable housing units will be owner occupied. They promised to address our concerns but have failed to do so.

The CHT promoted the land trust model at Palmer Place as a way to "create an affordable owner-occupied home with a one-time subsidy cost of $75,000" saying "land-trust buyers are still better off than renters." Now the CHT is promoting rentals in its 2008 Strategic Plan.
read the H-T Guest Column by CHT Executive Director Martina Guilfoil >>
read CHT's 2008 Strategic Plan >>

read what the Herald Tribune says about the housing trust >>

The Palmer Place Development Concept Plan and Binding Site Plan shows all the CHT villages as "Single-Family & Multi-Family." Sarasota County Zoning Regulations contains only one description for "Multifamily":

A multifamily structure on a single tract or parcel of land containing four or more units sharing common walls, often with separate units by floor as well. Multifamily units may vary in height from two to four stories. read SC Zoning Regulations 6.7.14 >>

Without revision, the Binding Concept Plan will allow Palmer Place to include subsidized rental apartment buildings even though the applicant has consistently said throughout this process that the CHT units will be owner-occupied townhouse units.

School Concerns -- In response to our concerns, the applicant has offered to set aside 35 acres within the project for use as a middle school. The Binding Concept Plan does not indicate where the school is to be located. Will its location cause a significant increase in density in the affordable housing portion? Currently the density in that area is more than 7 units per acre. Will carving out a school campus push the density over 10 units per acre?

 

08/29 County Commission Hearing

PUBLIC HEARING Board of County Commissioners August 29, 2007 -- The Development of Critical Concern application and Rezone Petition was heard by the Board of County Commissioners.

BRNC produced a 54 page booklet describing our concerns. The booklet was delivered to the Board prior to the hearing and 13 BRNC speakers presented our key issues during the hearing.

The Board indicated they shared many of the same concerns and expressed grave doubts about approving Palmer Place as submitted. They were especially concerned by the lack of roads and schools that are needed to support a 1,488 home development.

At the applicant's request, the Public Hearing was continued until December 11, 2007.

read BRNC Executive Summary of Concerns >>
read BRNC Comments and Recommendations booklet (4mb) >>

see 08/29/2007 Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing video >>
read Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Information Packet (3mb) >>
read Appendix to BCC Public Hearing Packet (18mb) >>

Post Planning Commission

Following the Planning Commission hearing, the developer invited BRNC to discuss our concerns and their responses.  A summary of the meeting follows:

Density – BRNC believes the 1,488 unit project on 412 acres is too intense for the area and is out of character with the surrounding established neighborhoods.  The developer stated they would not abridge their request for the maximum density bonus.  BRNC will continue its efforts to reduce the density at Palmer Place.

Timing – BRNC believes that the public’s interest in the Density for Affordability Bargain must be protected. If the developer gains a density bonus then the public must gain affordable housing in exchange, not just a too dense and out-of-character market-rate project outside the Urban Services Boundary.  The developer offered an incomplete completion schedule for the affordable units.  BRNC will continue its efforts to secure a completion guarantee to prevent the additional density from becoming a gift to the developer.

Affordability – BRNC believes that the Community Housing Trust of Sarasota County (CHT) units at Palmer Place must be affordable to the targeted buyers without enormous taxpayer subsidies.  Our analyses indicate tens of millions of dollars will be needed. The CEO of CHT says the density bonus will eliminate the need for subsidies, but has not substantiated that claim.  BRNC will continue its efforts to ensure Palmer Place does not require additional taxpayer subsidies

Palmer Blvd. – BRNC believes the developer is responsible for making all Palmer Blvd. improvements necessary to meet county standards.  The developer offered to pay for some improvements, but only if the county shares the cost.  BRNC will continue its efforts to ensure Palmer Blvd. meets county standards before 1,488 homes are approved at Palmer Place.

read applicant's proposed rezone petition modifications >>
read Planning Commission Public Hearing Information Packet (8mb) >>

07/12 Planning Commission Hearing

PUBLIC HEARING Planning Commission July 12, 2007 -- The Development of Critical Concern application and Rezone Petition was recommended to the Board of County Commissioners by a 5-3 vote.
read BRNC Testimony Summary >>
read Planning Commission Public Hearing Information Packet (8mb) >>
see 07/12/2007 Planning Commission Public Hearing video >>

BRNC CONCERNS Raised at 07/12/07 Public Hearing --

  • Intensity – Palmer Place increases the area’s density by 60 percent while occupying less than 10 percent of the land.
    see BRNC Intensity Illustration (1mb) >>

  • Timing – Palmer Place gains a significant density increase without providing any affordable housing.

  • Integration – Palmer Place violates best practices by segregating the affordable villages from the market rate ones.

  • Subsidies – Palmer Place pricing scheme requires tens of millions of dollars in additional taxpayer subsidies.

  • Palmer Blvd. –Palmer Blvd. must be improved to county standards between Iona Rd. and Webber Rd. before Palmer Place is built.
    see BRNC Palmer Blvd. Presentation (6mb) >>